Clean Power

Ukrainian (UA)English (United Kingdom)

The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine


The Institute of Electrodynamics

About Institute

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/publishing2019.52.088

CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF SYNTHESIS OF CONTROL SYSTEMS BY CONVERTERS OF AUTOMATED STAND-ALONE OBJECTS

T.G. Bahan1, V.S. Smyrnov1*, O.V. Samkov2, D.V. Vaits1
1- National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”
37 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine
2Institute of Electrodynamics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
Peremohy, 56, Kyiv-57, 03680, Ukraine,
e-mail: samkov@ied/org.ua
* ORCID ID : http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3840-7813

The improvement of electrical power supply systems of stand-alone objects is one of the important scientific and technical problems nowadays not only in terms of improving mass-energy indicators, but also ensuring specified performance characteristics under the influence of coordinate-parametric disturbances, namely, an improvement of multifunctionality invariance, adaptability, and robustness. In this paper, we consider methodological approach to the synthesis of the object control systems with a delay, which combines object management by traditional regulatory bodies and active influence on the object parameters in order to control the object itself by mathematical operator. Additionally, we developed a procedure of the system design of control systems with a delay on the basis of the control theory-H. The Smith quasiH-predictor is formulated similarly. This predictor is implemented in a feedback loop and can be greatly simplified. References 11, figures 3.
Key words: invariant converters, adaptive control systems, Smith predictor.



1. Antonov V.N., Prishvin A.M., Terekhov V.A., Yanchevskyi A.E. Adaptive systems of automatic control. Leningrad: Izd. Leningrad. universiteta, 1984. 204 p. (Rus)
2. Intelligent systems of automatic control. Moskva: Fizmatlit, 2001. 576 p. (Rus)
3. Aleksandrov E.E., Kozlov E.P., Kuznetsov B.I..Automatic control of moving objects and technological processes. V. 1: Theory of automatic control. Kharkiv: NTU KhPI, 2002. 490 p. (Ukr)
4. Smirnov V.S., Samkov A.V., Bulgach T.V. Organization of invariant amplification and conversion systems with the prediction ability for hardware of telecommunication equipment. Zvyazok. 2009. No 4. P. 47-51. (Rus)
5. Methods for robust, neuro-fuzzy and adaptive control. Moskva: Izd. MSTU named after N.E. Bauman, 2001. 744 p.
6. Mosca E., Pandolfi L. H- ControlTheory. London: BritishLibraryCataloguing, 1991. 325 p.
7. Vilanova R. IMC basedrobust PID design: Tuning guidelines and automatic tuning. Journal of Process Control. 2008. No 18(1). P. 61-70.
8. Kovrygo Yu.M., Bahan T.G. Method of design H-PID-controler for objects with delay. Naukovi visti NTUU KPI. 2013. No 1. P. 27-33. (Ukr)
9. Kovrygo Yu.M., Bahan T.G., Bunke O.S. Methods to ensure stability of control systems based on PI and PID controllers. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2013. V 3. No 3 (63). P. 58-63. (Ukr)
10. Bahan T.G. Synthesis of robust controller with an internal model for objects without self-alignment. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2017. V.4. No 2 (8). P. 27-32. (Ukr)
11. Brosilow C., Joseph B. Techniques of model-based control. USA: PrenticeHall, 2002. 704 p.

Received 05.03.2019  

PDF